You're reading: The Big Internet Math-Off, The Big Internet Math-Off 2019

The Big Internet Math-Off 2019, Group 2 – Marianne and Rachel vs Jorge Nuno Silva

This is the twenty-second match in our group stage: from Group 2, it’s Marianne Freiberger and Rachel Thomas up against Jorge Nuno Silva. The pitches are below, and at the end of this post there’s a poll where you can vote for your favourite bit of maths.

Take a look at both pitches, vote for the bit of maths that made you do the loudest “Aha!”, and if you know any more cool facts about either of the topics presented here, please write a comment below!

Marianne and Rachel – GPS, geometry and relativity

Marianne and Rachel are co-editors of Plus magazine, a free online magazine about maths aimed at a general audience. They have also written three popular maths books and edited one.

How did you get into work today? I planned my journey on my phone with an app that uses traffic information and live data on the location of buses. On other days I might drive, navigating with my car’s satnav, or if it’s sunny I’ll walk, following the blue dot of my location on the map on my phone.

These are just a few examples of the impact that GPS – the Global Positioning System – has on our lives everyday. It’s estimated that 4 billion people use this technology around the world and it has revolutionised many areas of life, including navigation, disaster relief, climate monitoring, agriculture and industry. And it works thanks to some very old, and relatively new maths.

Where am I?

GPS relies on a network of at least 24 satellites that circle the globe – currently there are 32 satellites but the exact number varies. They orbit in a constellation such that for any point in the world there will be at least four GPS satellites overhead at any time. We can precisely predict the orbits of these satellites and know with great accuracy their location at any time. The satellites constantly broadcast messages, giving the time and the satellite’s location when the message was sent. GPS receivers, like the one in your phone, listen out for these messages, calculating the time it took the message to travel from the satellite to you. Then using the familiar equation

\[ \text{distance travelled} = \text{speed} \times \text{time} \]

and the fact that the message was a radio signal travelling at the speed of light (approximately 300,000 kilometres per second), your phone can calculate your distance from the satellite. So if the message took 0.06 seconds to reach you, you are $0.06 \times 300{,}000 = 18{,}000$ kilometres from the satellite. From this information your phone knows that you are somewhere on a sphere with a radius of 18,000 kilometres, centred on the location of the satellite when it sent the message.

To narrow down our location further, your phone listens for the message from two more satellites (remember that there are at least four overhead at any moment) and performs a similar calculation for each. You now know that you are on three different spheres, centred on each of the three satellites. Generally, two spheres intersect in a circle. The third sphere will intersect that circle in two points. Since only one of these two points is on Earth, three satellites are enough to pin-point your location. The presence of four satellites overhead allows for error correction and a more robust system.

Three spheres centred on satellites orbiting the earth, intersecting at a single point on the surface
The GPS signals locate you on a sphere centred on each of the visible GPS satellites. The intersection of these spheres gives your location. (Image from NOAA)

Finding a way

The mathematics behind GPS is straight forward geometry, but making this happen reliably, accurately and affordably in real life has been a remarkable achievement. The timings involved in GPS calculations have to be incredibly accurate. Hugo Fruehauf led the team developing the miniaturised, radiation-hardened atomic clocks that are pivotal in the operation of the GPS satellites. These atomic clocks are incredibly accurate, gaining or losing less than a microsecond in a century. (You can read more about atomic clocks in Plus magazine)

A daily challenge to the successful operation of GPS comes from an area of physics you might not expect – Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity. Einstein’s special theory of relativity explains that time is relative: time passes more slowly for someone travelling at faster speeds relative to us. And his general theory of relativity combines space and time into a four-dimensional fabric of the Universe called spacetime. Spacetime is warped and bent by mass, and this curvature of spacetime means that time is dilated near a large mass – clocks tick more slowly closer to a large mass than those further away.

Amazingly, these two esoteric and mind-bending concepts have an effect on our daily lives. The GPS satellites are travelling at a speed of about 14,000 km/h relative to us on the ground. At this speed their clocks run about 7 microseconds a day slower than those here on Earth. This is partly counteracted by the fact that spacetime is warped by the mass of the Earth, causing the clocks on Earth to run 45 microseconds a day slower than those on the satellite orbiting around 20,000 km above.

Together, these relativistic effects means clocks on the satellite would run 38 microseconds a day faster than those here on Earth. If this wasn’t addressed it would mean your position as given by the GPS would be wrong by 10km after just one day! The atomic clocks on the satellites designed by Fruehauf are incredibly accurate, but they are specially designed to tick slower to counter these relativistic effects so that the time they keep while orbiting the Earth exactly matches the time of clocks on Earth.

So next time you rely on that blue dot on the map on your phone, remember it is thanks to geometry, relativity, and some incredible engineers that the dot knows where you are!

Jorge Nuno Silva – Older than π

Jorge Nuno Silva is a Portuguese mathematician (PhD UCBerkeley 1994), President of Ludus and Professor at the University of Lisbon (Department of History and Philosophy of Science). He is an editor of Recreational Mathematics Magazine and Board Game Studies Journal.

So, which bit of maths do you want to win? Vote now!

Match 22: Group 2 - Marianne and Rachel vs Jorge Nuno Silva

  • Jorge with pre-π circle areas (72%, 115 Votes)
  • Marianne and Rachel with GPS (28%, 44 Votes)

Total Voters: 159

This poll is closed.

Loading ... Loading ...

The poll closes at 9am BST on the 23rd. Whoever wins the most votes will win the match, and once the group stages are over, the number of wins will determine who goes through to the semi-final.

Come back tomorrow for our penultimate match of the group stages, featuring Vicky Neale and Sophie Carr. Or check out the announcement post for your follow-along wall chart!

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

$\LaTeX$: You can use LaTeX in your comments. e.g. $ e^{\pi i} $ for inline maths; \[ e^{\pi i} \] for display-mode (on its own line) maths.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>